Dutch MP calls for a ban on Holy Quran

A Dutch member of parliament has called for the Quran to be banned in the Netherlands, describing it as a “fascist book” which calls on people to kill non-believers and rape women.
 
Geert Wilders, leader of the far-right Freedom Party, called for the ban in a letter published in De Volkskrant newspaper.

In his letter, Wilders compares the Muslim holy book to Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s autobiography, and said the Quran has “no place in our constitutional state”.
 
“I have been saying this for years: there is no such thing as a moderate Islam,” Wilders wrote.
 
Wilders’ Freedom Party holds nine seats in the Netherlands’ 150 seat parliament.

Call for ban

Wilders also said several chapters in the Quran “call on Muslims to oppress, persecute or kill Christians, Jews, dissidents and non-believers, to beat and rape women and to establish an Islamic state by force”.

The publication of the letter comes after a weekend attack on Eshan Jami, a young Dutch politician, who established a group to support people who have renounced Islam.

Jami, who was not visibly injured in the attack, is now under police protection as is Wilders.

“Ban this wretched book like Mein Kampf is banned! Send a signal to Jami’s attackers and other Islamic radicals that the Quran cannot be used in the Netherlands as an inspiration or an excuse for violence,” Wilders said.

Wilders acknowledged that his plan would not receive majority support in the Dutch parliament.

“I am fed up with Islam in the Netherlands: no more Muslim immigrants allowed. I am fed up with the worship of Allah and Muhammad in the Netherlands: no more mosques,” his letter concluded.
Source: Al-Jazeera TV Network

Advertisements

12 Responses to Dutch MP calls for a ban on Holy Quran

  1. Amrita says:

    Mein Kampf is banned? Since when? It’s access restricted in Germany till 2015, I know, but the Netherlands?

  2. darvesh says:

    That’s what the story suggest, Hitlor’s Biography seems to be banned in Holland.

  3. jim says:

    If you read the hole of the quran there is no place that says rape women wilder chats out of his azz, and the holy quran condems attack on women. and all you far-right freedom party can kiss my azz and anybody that agrees with you wilders can kiss my azz. the far-right freedom party is a racist and facist party.

  4. Mulla Nafs-e-Zakiya says:

    I believe that entire western society should ban Muslims and should go ruthlessly against Muslims in general, cause Muslims will never unite on their own! Thanks to the non muslims, in this century, we will be seeing the unification of the ummah!

    Mulla!

  5. Muhammad says:

    Dear any Reader

    i would like to inform all that people which are agree to wilders thay need world largest war they don’t need to leave in the world normaly.
    they need to muslam came to us and fuck all our, nonmuslam like wilders and his friends. they have no power only use media.
    but if muslam start war this war not like world war 2 or 1, heavy osma war not only one building.
    muslam don’t like war but if you attach on muslam they will not salient , all muslam were submit has head than thay get freedom.
    wilders comments other western region publish cartoon this is childern playing in the ground. come to the field for war then we see what happening.
    how to ban holly quran and publish qureen

  6. asmar ahmad says:

    Assalam o Aliakum.
    why u think that u r doing a good job.if u have any self respeqet of others then who can u do that?
    Allah don`t leave His Beloved ppl in the cercumstansic of evil ppl
    some times He give time to enemies of His ppl
    that they can think over it
    and change therselves
    and if he oesn`t come on right path so he …..

  7. asmar ahmad says:

    if u belive on any teachings of any scollar or any famos person
    if u like him so u don`t neglect him by others false errors.
    so how cann`t we muslims feel anger on that thing?
    if any say false how we believe or heard him
    so stop these things coz we r very peacefull…

  8. asmar ahmad says:

    describing it as a “fascist book” which calls on people to kill non-believers and rape women.
    this statement not according to real
    if u see the full sentence u will find the answer what is right and what is wrong

  9. Asjad says:

    If you read the hole of the quran there is no place that says rape women wilder chats out of his azz, and the holy quran condems attack on women. and all you far-right freedom party can kiss my azz and anybody that agrees with you wilders can kiss my azz. the far-right freedom party is a racist and facist party.

  10. Asjad says:

    If you read the hole of the quran there is no place that says rape women wilder chats out of his azz, and the holy quran condems attack on women. prophet mohammad (sla )has no any photo and Islam is a mercy and best relagion.

  11. Asjad Nawaz says:

    The Qur’an itself expresses that it is the book of guidance. Therefore it rarely offers detailed accounts of historical events; the text instead places emphasis typically on the moral significance of an event rather than its narrative sequence.[20] It does not describe natural facts in a scientific manner but teaches that natural and supernatural events are signs of God.[21]

    The Qur’an was written down by Muhammad’s companions (sahabah) while he was alive, although the prime method of transmission was orally. It was compiled in the time of Abu Bakr, the first caliph, and was standardized in the time of Uthman, the third caliph. The Qur’an in its actual form is generally considered by academic scholars to record the words spoken by Muhammad because the search for variants in Western academia has not yielded any differences of great significance and that historically controversy over the content of the Qur’an has never become a main point. [22][23] Therefore all Muslims, Sunni or Shia use the same Qur’an.

  12. asmar ahmad says:

    How Holy Prophet Reacted When The Prophet Was Called The Meanest.

    The unfortunate reaction of Muslims all over the world must have caused a great deal of anguish to the soul of our beloved Holy Prophet. How he would have reacted to such an occurrence? Here is a well documented a historic parallel.

    When the holy Prophet left Mecca after 13 years of persecution and arrived in Medina. In 622 A.D, the Meccan Chief addressed a letter to Abdullah bin Ubbay bin Salul, a well known leader of Medina, who was soon to be the king of Medina, urging him to restrain the Prophet.

    Abdullah became a Muslim but secretly worked against the interests of Islam and thus became known as the chief of Hypocrites. The arrival of Holy prophet had despoiled his plans to become the chief of Medina. Abdullah bin Ubbay bin Salul thought it to be a God-sent opportunity and started his plans to denigrate Holy Prophet. The betel of Uhad which Muslims lost provided a fit occasion. In the meantime a nearby tribe of Banu Mustaliq was planning to attack Medina; Muslims foiled this attack in time and defeated them.

    Holy Prophet decided to stay in the town of Banu Mustaliq. Soon after a row arose between an immigrant Muslim (known a Mohajir) and a local Muslim of Medina (known as Ansar). Abdullah bin ubbay bin salul cleverly exploited the situation to his advantage and made a provocative speech and said “Let us return to, Medina then the most honored (himself) among the citizens will turn out the most despised and meanest (meaning the Holy Prophet). Through his uncle, a young man reported this observation to the Holy Prophet. The Prophet sent for Abdullah bin Ubbay bin Salul and his friends. They totally denied it and said it is not true. The Prophet said nothing. The truth began to spread.

    Abdullah bin Ubbay’s son Abdullah heard this report. He was a devout Muslim and approached the Prophet and submitted “Oh Prophet my father has insulted you. Death is the punishment. If you decide so, I would rather have you command me to kill my father. If you ask someone else and my father dies at his hand. I may have to avenge my father’s killing and I may incur the displeasure of God in this way”. The prophet said, “I have no such intention. I will treat your father with compassion and consideration.”

    This did not satisfy his son. He went to his father and stopped him in a threatening way and said he would not let him proceed further on road to Medina until he withdrew his words.

    The lips which said that the Prophet is meanest and despised and I am the honoured must now say “the prophet is most honored and I am the despised”. His father was astonished and frightened and had no option but to say “I agree, my son, that Muhammad is the most honored and I am the meanest”.

    This was not a mere incident or a trifle event. God in the Holy Quran spoke about it:

    “They say, if we return to Medina, the one most exalted will, surely drive out there from the one most mean, while honor belong to Allah and his messenger.”(63:9)

    And this is not all, when Abdullah bin Ubbay bin Salul died the Holy Prophet himself led his funeral prayers (a singular honor). When Hadhrat Omar, who latter became the second caliph, heard this, he tried to persuade the Prophet not to lead his funeral by quoting verse 7 of the same chapter of the Holy Quran:

    “Whether thou (the Prophet) ask forgiveness for them or ask not forgiveness for them Allah will never forgive them.”

    Anyhow the prophet led his funeral prayers and placed his own shirt on his dead body despite the protest.

    The holy Prophet might have prayed for the Danish Cartoonist as well prayed for his forgiveness.

    same to for this pm of Dutch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: